Our Practice Areas

Millions Of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients.
Dedicated & Tenacious Litigation Lawyers in Indianapolis

Non-Compete Compliance Attorney in Indianapolis, IN

Non-compete agreements are meant to protect a business’s legitimate interests, like trade secrets and customer relationships, but they only work if they’re written and enforced correctly. Non-compete compliance covers both sides of that equation, helping businesses draft and enforce agreements that will actually hold up in court, and helping individuals understand whether an agreement they signed is enforceable against them.

Indiana courts generally enforce non-compete agreements, but only if they’re reasonable in scope, geography, and duration, and only to the extent they protect a legitimate business interest rather than simply preventing competition. Indiana law also places specific restrictions on non-compete agreements for physicians. Courts here can sever or strike unreasonable provisions from an otherwise valid agreement in some circumstances, though Indiana generally won’t rewrite an overly broad restriction to make it enforceable, which makes how an agreement is originally drafted especially important.

At RileyCate, we help employers draft and enforce non-compete and non-solicitation agreements, and we help employees and new employers understand and, when appropriate, challenge agreements that go further than the law allows. Whether you’re trying to protect your business or trying to take a new job without getting sued, the reasonableness of the specific agreement is almost always the central question, and answering it requires looking closely at the industry, the role, and what interest the agreement is actually meant to protect.

Non-compete disputes often move quickly, sometimes requiring emergency requests for injunctions before a case is fully litigated, and that’s exactly the kind of high pressure situation where trial-tested representation matters. Will Riley and Russell Cate lead our non-compete team. Russell Cate is recognized as a Super Lawyer, and his civil litigation practice includes extensive experience with business disputes, with appellate arguments alongside Will Riley before the Indiana Court of Appeals and the Indiana Supreme Court that give our clients real depth in this area. Will Riley’s Super Lawyers, Top 100 Trial Lawyers, and AV Preeminent recognition reflects that same trial credibility.

Will and Russell personally oversee every case we take on, drawing on our skilled and resourceful team of attorneys, associates, and staff in whatever mix the size and complexity of your matter calls for, so your matter moves quickly when it needs to. We also offer alternatives to the standard billable hour for qualifying matters.

Why Choose Us

Nobody plans to need a lawyer. When something goes wrong, what you need first is someone who will listen, tell you honestly where you stand, and take the next steps off your plate. That is how every case at RileyCate, LLC begins.

We represent individuals, families, and small businesses across Fishers, Indianapolis, and surrounding counties in personal injury and complex litigation, business and real estate disputes, criminal defense, and appeals.

Will Riley and Russell Cate personally oversee every matter, staffing each case to its size and complexity. Both are recognized as Super Lawyers and have argued before the Indiana Court of Appeals and Supreme Court. Will also holds an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell and a Top 100 Trial Lawyer designation.

We are trial-tested, not just settlement-focused. We have tried hundreds of cases, because insurance companies, opposing businesses, and prosecutors negotiate differently with a firm willing to go the distance.

About RileyCate

Indiana courts will generally enforce non-compete agreements that are reasonable in scope, geography, and duration, and that protect a legitimate business interest like trade secrets or customer relationships. Agreements that are broader than necessary to protect that interest are less likely to be enforced as written. Indiana also restricts non-compete agreements for physicians specifically.
Reasonableness generally depends on whether the time period, geographic area, and scope of restricted activity are no broader than necessary to protect the employer’s legitimate business interests. A one year restriction limited to a specific industry and region is more likely to be upheld than an indefinite, nationwide restriction on any kind of work. Courts weigh these factors together rather than applying a strict formula, so a factor that looks unreasonable on its own can sometimes be balanced out by the others, which is part of why two agreements that look similar on paper can produce very different outcomes in court.
It depends on the specific terms of your agreement and whether the new position would violate a reasonable restriction. Some non-competes are overly broad and may not hold up if challenged, but that determination usually requires a court or a careful legal analysis rather than a guess. Talking with an attorney before accepting a new position can help you avoid a lawsuit or negotiate around the issue.
An overly broad agreement, such as one with an unreasonably long duration or an unlimited geographic area, may not be fully enforceable in Indiana. Courts here can sometimes strike unreasonable provisions if the agreement is written in a way that allows it, but they generally won’t rewrite the terms to make an unreasonable agreement enforceable. This is one of the areas where the original drafting of the agreement makes a significant difference.
An employer may be able to obtain an injunction stopping the prohibited activity, along with damages for losses caused by the violation, such as lost business or clients. Because ongoing harm can be difficult to undo, employers often move quickly to seek injunctive relief rather than waiting for a full trial. The available remedies depend on what the agreement itself provides and the facts of the violation.
Yes, Indiana law places specific restrictions on non-compete agreements involving physicians, reflecting concerns about patient access to care. If you’re a physician or a healthcare employer dealing with a non-compete, the analysis is different from a typical business non-compete. An attorney familiar with these specific rules can help you understand how they apply to your situation.
Non-solicitation agreements, which restrict someone from pursuing former clients, customers, or coworkers rather than banning them from working in the industry altogether, are generally viewed as less restrictive and are often easier to enforce than a full non-compete. Indiana courts still apply a reasonableness standard to these agreements, but a narrowly written non-solicitation clause tends to hold up better than a broad ban on competing work. Employers looking to protect client relationships sometimes find this a more enforceable alternative to a traditional non-compete, particularly in industries where client relationships, rather than trade secrets, are the primary business interest at stake.

Whether you’re an employer looking to enforce a non-compete or an employee facing one, time matters, especially if a new job or a departing employee is already involved. We offer a consultation to review your agreement and situation. Reach out to RileyCate today to speak with a non-compete attorney about your matter.

What Our Clients Say

Related News

Slip and Fall Sign

Indianapolis Slip & Fall Lawyer – When You Need One, and What to Expect

Truck Accident Lawyer Indianapolis: Recovering Big in Semi-Collision Cases

Best Indianapolis Car Accident Lawyer: How to Choose & Contact One