Our Practice Areas

Millions Of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients.
Dedicated & Tenacious Litigation Lawyers in Indianapolis

Contract Disputes Attorney in Indianapolis, IN

Not every contract dispute is a straightforward case of one side failing to perform. Sometimes the disagreement is over what the contract actually means, whether it was formed properly in the first place, or whether one side was misled into signing it. Contract disputes cover this broader category, including disagreements over ambiguous terms, claims that a contract should be voided due to fraud or mistake, and disputes over whether an oral agreement is enforceable at all.

Indiana courts generally try to enforce contracts as written, giving significant weight to the plain language the parties agreed to. When that language is ambiguous, courts may look at the parties’ conduct, industry custom, and other evidence to determine what was actually intended. Contracts formed through fraud, duress, or a fundamental mistake can sometimes be rescinded or reformed rather than enforced as written, though these are higher bars to clear than a straightforward breach claim.

At RileyCate, we handle contract disputes that go beyond simple non-performance, including disputes over interpretation, formation, and validity. We represent businesses seeking to enforce agreements as they understood them, and businesses trying to get out of agreements they believe were formed unfairly or under false pretenses. Each of these disputes requires a close read of the contract language and the circumstances surrounding it, along with a clear understanding of what evidence exists outside the four corners of the document itself.

Contract interpretation disputes are exactly the kind of case that can turn on how an appellate court reads ambiguous language, which is where our appellate depth sets us apart. Will Riley and Russell Cate lead our contract disputes team. Russell Cate is recognized as a Super Lawyer and has argued alongside Will Riley before the Indiana Court of Appeals and the Indiana Supreme Court, and that experience shapes how our team builds a contract dispute case from the trial court level up. Will Riley’s Super Lawyers, Top 100 Trial Lawyers, and AV Preeminent recognition reflects decades of the same trial-tested approach.

Will and Russell personally oversee every matter we take, staffing it with the attorneys, associates, and staff the case calls for based on its size and complexity, so your matter gets consistent attention throughout. We also offer alternatives to the standard billable hour for qualifying matters.

Why Choose Us

Nobody plans to need a lawyer. When something goes wrong, what you need first is someone who will listen, tell you honestly where you stand, and take the next steps off your plate. That is how every case at RileyCate, LLC begins.

We represent individuals, families, and small businesses across Fishers, Indianapolis, and surrounding counties in personal injury and complex litigation, business and real estate disputes, criminal defense, and appeals.

Will Riley and Russell Cate personally oversee every matter, staffing each case to its size and complexity. Both are recognized as Super Lawyers and have argued before the Indiana Court of Appeals and Supreme Court. Will also holds an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell and a Top 100 Trial Lawyer designation.

We are trial-tested, not just settlement-focused. We have tried hundreds of cases, because insurance companies, opposing businesses, and prosecutors negotiate differently with a firm willing to go the distance.

About RileyCate

When contract language is genuinely ambiguous, Indiana courts may look beyond the written words to evidence like the parties’ prior dealings, industry custom, and communications during negotiation to determine what was intended. Whether a term is actually ambiguous, as opposed to just disputed, is itself often a legal question a court has to decide first. An attorney can help you evaluate how strong your interpretation is likely to be.
Yes, in certain circumstances, including fraud, duress, undue influence, or a mutual mistake about a fundamental fact, a contract can potentially be rescinded or voided. These claims require more than simply regretting the deal, they require showing the agreement was fundamentally flawed in how it was formed. An attorney can assess whether your situation meets that threshold.
Fraud in the inducement happens when one party makes a false statement of material fact to convince the other party to sign a contract they otherwise wouldn’t have agreed to. If proven, it can be grounds to void the contract and potentially recover damages. These claims require showing the statement was false, that it was relied on, and that the reliance caused harm.
Many oral contracts are enforceable in Indiana, though some types of agreements, like those involving real estate or agreements that can’t be performed within a year, generally must be in writing under Indiana’s statute of frauds. Even when an oral contract is legally enforceable, proving its terms without a written record can be significantly harder. Any communications, emails, or partial performance related to the agreement can become important evidence.
A genuine mutual mistake, where both parties were wrong about a basic fact underlying the contract, can sometimes support reforming or voiding the agreement. A unilateral mistake, where only one party was wrong, is much harder to use as grounds to escape a contract, especially if the other side reasonably relied on the agreement as written. The specific facts of how the mistake happened matter significantly.
If your contract requires mediation or arbitration before litigation, Indiana courts will generally enforce that clause and require you to follow that process first. Skipping a required step can delay your case or even get it dismissed. An attorney can review the clause with you to make sure you’re following the correct process from the start, including any deadlines for initiating that process before you lose the right to enforce your underlying claim.
Unconscionability refers to a contract, or a specific provision, that’s so one-sided or unfair that a court refuses to enforce it, typically because one party had vastly superior bargaining power or the terms are shockingly unreasonable. Indiana courts apply this doctrine sparingly, since simply having a bad deal isn’t enough on its own. It usually takes a combination of unfair terms and an unfair process, like fine print or a take-it-or-leave-it agreement, before a court will step in, and courts generally look at the full context in which the contract was signed rather than any single clause in isolation, including the relative sophistication of the parties involved.

If you’re dealing with a contract that doesn’t mean what you thought it meant, or one you believe you were misled into signing, we can help you understand your options. We offer a consultation to review the contract and the circumstances involved. Reach out to RileyCate today to speak with a contract disputes attorney about your situation.

What Our Clients Say

Related News

Slip and Fall Sign

Indianapolis Slip & Fall Lawyer – When You Need One, and What to Expect

Truck Accident Lawyer Indianapolis: Recovering Big in Semi-Collision Cases

Best Indianapolis Car Accident Lawyer: How to Choose & Contact One