Our Practice Areas

Millions Of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients.
Dedicated & Tenacious Litigation Lawyers in Indianapolis

Call Now
Schedule a Consultation

Construction Delay Claims Attorney in Indianapolis, IN

Few construction projects finish exactly on schedule, but not every delay is treated the same way under a construction contract. Delay and disruption claims cover disputes over who caused a project’s delay, whether it was excusable, and who bears the financial cost of the lost time, including extended overhead, additional labor costs, and in some cases liquidated damages for late completion.

Construction contracts generally distinguish between excusable delays, like those caused by the owner or unforeseeable events, and non-excusable delays, like a contractor simply falling behind schedule. Some delays are also compensable, meaning the party who caused them owes damages for the resulting costs, while others may extend the schedule without any financial payment. Many contracts include liquidated damages clauses that set a specific daily or weekly dollar amount owed for late completion, which can significantly raise the stakes of a delay dispute. When more than one party contributed to a delay, known as concurrent delay, sorting out responsibility becomes even more complicated.

At RileyCate, we help contractors, subcontractors, and owners pursue and defend against delay and disruption claims, which almost always come down to detailed project documentation. Schedules, daily logs, correspondence, and change order records often make or break these cases, since proving what caused a delay and how much it cost requires reconstructing a clear timeline of what actually happened on the project.

Request a Consultation

Delay claims often require piecing together a detailed factual record and presenting it persuasively, exactly the kind of trial preparation we build every case around. Will Riley and Russell Cate lead our delay claims team. Russell Cate is recognized as a Super Lawyer and has argued alongside Will Riley before the Indiana Court of Appeals and the Indiana Supreme Court, and his extensive trial experience shapes how our team approaches fact-intensive disputes like these. Will Riley’s Super Lawyers, Top 100 Trial Lawyers, and AV Preeminent recognition reflects that same trial-tested approach across decades of practice.

Will and Russell personally oversee every case we take on, drawing on our skilled and resourceful team of attorneys, associates, and staff in whatever mix the size and complexity of your matter calls for, so your delay claim gets the careful documentation review these cases require. We also offer alternatives to the standard billable hour for qualifying matters.

Why Choose Us

Nobody plans to need a lawyer. When something goes wrong, what you need first is someone who will listen, tell you honestly where you stand, and take the next steps off your plate. That is how every case at RileyCate, LLC begins.

We represent individuals, families, and small businesses across Fishers, Indianapolis, and surrounding counties in personal injury and complex litigation, business and real estate disputes, criminal defense, and appeals.

Will Riley and Russell Cate personally oversee every matter, staffing each case to its size and complexity. Both are recognized as Super Lawyers and have argued before the Indiana Court of Appeals and Supreme Court. Will also holds an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell and a Top 100 Trial Lawyer designation.

We are trial-tested, not just settlement-focused. We have tried hundreds of cases, because insurance companies, opposing businesses, and prosecutors negotiate differently with a firm willing to go the distance.

About RileyCate

An excusable delay is generally one caused by circumstances outside the contractor’s control, like an owner’s failure to provide access or an unforeseeable event, while a non-excusable delay is one caused by the contractor’s own failure to perform on schedule. This distinction matters because it usually determines whether the contractor is entitled to a schedule extension, financial compensation, both, or neither. What qualifies as excusable often depends on the specific language in your contract.
If the delay was caused by another party and is compensable under your contract, you may be able to recover costs like extended overhead, additional labor, and equipment costs tied to the extra time on the project. Recovering these costs generally requires clear documentation connecting the delay to the specific expenses claimed. An attorney can help you assess whether your delay is likely to be considered compensable.
Liquidated damages are a specific dollar amount, often calculated per day, that a contract sets as the penalty for late completion, agreed to in advance rather than proven after the fact. Indiana courts will generally enforce a liquidated damages clause as long as the amount is a reasonable estimate of actual harm rather than a punitive penalty. Whether a specific clause is enforceable can itself become a point of dispute.
Proving a delay claim generally requires detailed project documentation, including the original schedule, daily logs, correspondence about the delay, and records showing the actual cause and duration of the lost time. Courts and arbitrators want to see a clear, well-documented timeline rather than a general claim that the project ran late. Keeping thorough records throughout a project is the single best way to protect your position if a delay dispute arises later.
When both the owner and the contractor contributed to a delay, known as concurrent delay, courts often limit or deny compensation for the overlapping period, though the specific outcome depends on the facts and the contract language. Sorting out concurrent delay usually requires a detailed schedule analysis to separate the causes. This is one of the more technically complex areas of construction litigation.
Keep your original project schedule, any schedule updates, daily logs, written correspondence about delays or site conditions, change order records, and photos documenting site conditions and progress. This kind of contemporaneous documentation is far more persuasive than reconstructing events after the fact. If you’re already in a delay dispute, an attorney can help you identify what records will matter most to your specific claim.
A no-damages-for-delay clause attempts to limit a contractor to a schedule extension only, with no financial compensation, even for delays caused by the owner. Indiana courts will generally enforce these clauses, though there are recognized exceptions in some circumstances, such as delays caused by active interference or bad faith on the owner’s part. Whether an exception applies to your situation requires a close look at both the clause and the facts of what caused the delay, which is why documenting the owner’s conduct throughout the project matters even when this kind of clause is in play.

If a project delay is costing you money, or you’re facing a delay claim you believe is unfounded, we can help you build or defend the case using your project records. We offer a consultation to review your documentation and the circumstances involved. Reach out to RileyCate today to speak with a construction delay claims attorney about your project.

Table of Contents

Related Areas

Schedule a Consultation

What Our Clients Say

Related News

Slip and Fall Sign

Indianapolis Slip & Fall Lawyer – When You Need One, and What to Expect

Read more

Truck Accident Lawyer Indianapolis: Recovering Big in Semi-Collision Cases

Read more

Best Indianapolis Car Accident Lawyer: How to Choose & Contact One

Read more