Our Practice Areas

Millions Of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients.
Dedicated & Tenacious Litigation Lawyers in Indianapolis

Construction Defects Attorney in Indianapolis, IN

Not every problem with a finished building shows up right away. Construction defects range from obvious issues discovered shortly after completion to hidden problems that don’t surface for years, like water intrusion, foundation issues, or structural deficiencies that only become apparent after significant damage has already occurred. A construction defect claim seeks to hold the responsible party, whether that’s a contractor, subcontractor, architect, engineer, or materials manufacturer, accountable for work that didn’t meet the required standard.

Indiana law distinguishes between patent defects, which are reasonably discoverable through inspection, and latent defects, which aren’t apparent until later. That distinction can affect when the clock starts running on a claim. Indiana also applies a statute of repose to construction claims, generally cutting off the ability to sue over ten years after a project’s substantial completion, regardless of when a defect is actually discovered. This is different from a standard statute of limitations, and it can bar even a legitimate claim if too much time has passed since construction finished.

At RileyCate, we represent property owners, developers, and businesses pursuing construction defect claims, and we represent contractors and design professionals defending against claims they believe are unfounded or exaggerated. These cases almost always require expert analysis to establish what actually went wrong and who’s responsible, and we work with qualified experts to build that record on either side of a dispute.

Construction defect cases often involve complex, technical evidence and multiple potentially responsible parties, which makes trial-tested litigation experience especially important. Will Riley and Russell Cate lead our construction defects team. Russell Cate is recognized as a Super Lawyer and has argued alongside Will Riley before the Indiana Court of Appeals and the Indiana Supreme Court, and his civil litigation background includes product liability and business disputes that require the same kind of technical case building. Will Riley’s Super Lawyers, Top 100 Trial Lawyers, and AV Preeminent recognition brings that same trial credibility to every defect case we handle.

Every matter we take on is personally overseen by Will and Russell, who staff it with the attorneys, associates, and staff it calls for based on its size and complexity, so your case gets the sustained attention these often document-heavy matters require. We also offer alternatives to the standard billable hour for qualifying matters.

Why Choose Us

Nobody plans to need a lawyer. When something goes wrong, what you need first is someone who will listen, tell you honestly where you stand, and take the next steps off your plate. That is how every case at RileyCate, LLC begins.

We represent individuals, families, and small businesses across Fishers, Indianapolis, and surrounding counties in personal injury and complex litigation, business and real estate disputes, criminal defense, and appeals.

Will Riley and Russell Cate personally oversee every matter, staffing each case to its size and complexity. Both are recognized as Super Lawyers and have argued before the Indiana Court of Appeals and Supreme Court. Will also holds an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell and a Top 100 Trial Lawyer designation.

We are trial-tested, not just settlement-focused. We have tried hundreds of cases, because insurance companies, opposing businesses, and prosecutors negotiate differently with a firm willing to go the distance.

About RileyCate

A construction defect is a deficiency in the design, materials, or workmanship of a building that causes it to fail to perform as it should, ranging from cosmetic issues to serious structural or safety problems. Common examples include water intrusion, foundation cracking, and improperly installed systems. Whether a specific issue qualifies as an actionable defect often requires an expert evaluation.
Liability depends on what caused the defect and who was responsible for that aspect of the project, which could be the general contractor, a subcontractor, the architect or engineer who designed it, or a manufacturer if defective materials were involved. More than one party can share responsibility depending on how the defect occurred. Identifying the responsible party usually requires an expert investigation into the cause.
Indiana generally applies a ten year statute of repose to construction defect claims, meaning a lawsuit generally can’t be filed more than ten years after the project’s substantial completion, regardless of when the defect was actually discovered. This is separate from Indiana’s standard statute of limitations, which can also apply and may create an even earlier deadline depending on when the defect was or should have been discovered. Because these deadlines interact in ways that aren’t always intuitive, it’s worth talking with an attorney as soon as a defect is identified.
A patent defect is one that’s reasonably discoverable through a normal inspection, while a latent defect is hidden and doesn’t become apparent until later, sometimes years after construction is complete. This distinction can affect when the clock starts running on your claim, since a latent defect claim generally can’t accrue until the problem is discovered or reasonably should have been. Water intrusion and structural issues are common examples of defects that often start out latent.
In almost all cases, yes. Construction defect claims usually require an expert to explain what went wrong, why it happened, and what it will cost to fix, since these are technical questions outside the knowledge of a typical judge or jury. Choosing a qualified, credible expert is often one of the most important factors in how a defect case turns out. We work with experienced experts across a range of construction disciplines to build that record.
Yes, a warranty claim is based on specific promises made in a contract or by a manufacturer, while a construction defect claim can be based on negligence or a failure to meet general industry standards, regardless of whether a specific warranty applies. In some cases, you may have both a warranty claim and a separate defect claim available. An attorney can help you evaluate which claims apply and which offers the strongest path to recovery.
A construction defect claim often overlaps with negligence, but it can also be based on breach of contract or breach of warranty theories that don’t require proving the same elements as negligence. Which legal theory fits best depends on the relationship between the parties and whether a direct contract exists between you and the party responsible for the defect. Pursuing multiple legal theories at once is common in these cases, since each one has different requirements and potential defenses.

If you’ve discovered a defect in a building you own or developed, or you’re facing a defect claim you believe is unfounded, we can help you understand where you stand. We offer a consultation to review the facts and the timeline involved. Reach out to RileyCate today to speak with a construction defects attorney about your situation.

What Our Clients Say

Related News

Slip and Fall Sign

Indianapolis Slip & Fall Lawyer – When You Need One, and What to Expect

Truck Accident Lawyer Indianapolis: Recovering Big in Semi-Collision Cases

Best Indianapolis Car Accident Lawyer: How to Choose & Contact One